It’s Time to Grow Up
What does it mean to grow up? Did we not become grown-ups when puberty arrived, when we stepped into large bodies and large agendas? Did we not grow up when we left our familial homes and stepped out into the world and said: “Hire me — I can do that job,” “Marry me — I will hold my end of the deal,” “Trust me — I can carry that responsibility”? Have we not been grown-ups through responsibly exercising parental, fiduciary, relational, and societal roles for years? And yet, when I have asked people in workshops — reasonable, accomplished, responsible people — “Where do you need to grow up?” why has no one yet asked me to explain that question, why has no one challenged the legitimacy of the assignment, and why has everyone begun writing in a matter of minutes, if not seconds? So, how is it that we play all these mature roles yet know in our heart of hearts that we still have to grow up?
In traditional societies, hanging tenuously to this whirling planet, surviving the onslaught of the elements, harsh conditions, and hostile agencies of all kinds, growing up was a matter of survival. The tribe could not afford to have children idling about. So, without a central committee sending out printed instructions, each civilization evolved rites of passage designed to ensure the transition from the naiveté and dependency of childhood to adult sensibilities that sacrifice comfort and sloth in service to the common interest. After all, social conditions and structures evolve, and technology evolves, but the same human psyche, the same psychodynamics manifest in our ancestors, courses through our current lives. For the bulk of recorded history, we have all had to face the summons to grow up. The difference is that our ancestors were keen observers who understood there is scant motive to sacrifice comfort and dependence unless one is required to do so. So, independently, without a central committee advising them, they came up with something useful: rites of passage.
All passages provide a transition from something that has played out, died, or ceased to be productive. That is what psychotherapy seeks to do in so many cases. Since few, if any, would willingly leave the security of home for the insecure status of adulthood, young people were not asked. They were removed, sometimes forcibly. The six stages of passage varied in form, intensity, duration, and cultural accoutrements, but essentially they were comparable around the world. They involved departure from home, not with an engraved invitation, not with a polite request, but suddenly and decisively. Second, there was a ceremony of death, ranging from being buried in the earth, to immersion, to an effacement of one’s known referents. Third, there was a ceremony of rebirth because an emergent being, a differentiated psychology, was dawning. Fourth, they were given the teachings, in three categories: the archetypal stories of the creation, of the gods, of the tribal history; the general roles and polity of adulthood in that culture; and the specific tools of hunting, fishing, child-bearing, and agriculture unique to that tribe. Fifth, there was an ordeal of some kind, often involving isolation in order that one learn to cope with fear and find internal resources. And sixth, after prolonged separation, there was the return to the community as a separated adult. Only in this way did young people transition from the naiveté, dependency, and avoidances of childhood to the expectations of adulthood.
When we examine contemporary culture, we find these rites of passage missing. Instead of tools for personal strength and survival, we teach computer skills. We allow children to abide within the bosom of a protective culture, and accordingly, we have very few initiated, separated, independent persons of adult sensibility. Aging alone does not do it; playing major roles in life does not do it. What is it that shifts one from a needy, blaming, dependent psychology to one of psychospiritual independence? What characterizes our culture better than a needy, whiny clamor for instant gratification, a flight from accountability, and an inability to tolerate the tension of opposites, rather than learning to live with ambiguity over the long haul and transcending the desire for rapid resolution of life’s quiddities?
Life’s two biggest threats we carry within: fear and lethargy. Every morning we rise to find two gremlins at the foot of the bed. The one named Fear says, “The world is too big for you, too much. You are not up to it. Find a way to slip-slide away again today.” And the one named Lethargy says, “Hey, chill out. You’ve had a hard day. Turn on the telly, surf the Internet, have some chocolate. Tomorrow’s another day.” Those perverse twins munch on our souls every day. No matter what we do today, they will turn up again tomorrow. Over time, they usurp more days of our lives than those to which we may lay fair claim. More energy is spent in any given day on managing fear through unreflective compliance, or avoidance, than any other value. While it is natural to expend energy managing our fears, the magnitude of this effort on a daily basis cannot be overemphasized.
On the other hand, lethargy takes so many seductive forms. We can simply avoid tasks, stay away from what is difficult for us, find ways to numb our days through the thousand soporifics and analgesics the world provides, or possibly worst of all, fall into fundamentalist forms of thinking that finesse subtlety, fuzz opposites, seek simplistic solutions to complex issues, and still our spirit’s distress with the palliative balm of certainty. Indeed, we have a vast wired culture to help us in this task, a connected twenty-four-hour distraction whose hum both stills anxiety and dims the plaintive cries of our spirit to be served. Drowning in distractions, palliated by simple solutions, and lulled by patronizing authorities, we can sleep our life away and never awaken to the summons of the soul that resounds within each of us.
In The Eden Project: The Search for the Magical Other, a book on the psychodynamics of relationships, I noted that all relationships are characterized by two dynamics: projection and transference. A projection is a mechanism whereby our psychological contents leave us and enter the world seeking an object — a person, an institution, a role — upon which to fasten. Because this occurs unconsciously, we then respond to the other as if we know it, rather than its refracted distortion. Similarly, we transfer to that other — person, institution, role — our personal history in regard to that kind of experience. So, we infantilize our relationships with our intimate other, church, government, organization, or any role that carries presumptive authority with it. In re-evoking our earlier experiences, we unwittingly diminish our adult capacity and present interests by approaching the new moment with avoidant, controlling, or compliant behaviors from our past.
Given the power, the ubiquity, and the subtlety of these projected contents, these transferred historic strategies, we expect others to take care of us, while we cavil against the inadequacies of our affiliations and wonder why our roles alone fail to confirm our maturity and provide continuing satisfaction. From this gap between the expectations of our projections and transferences, we may from time to time come to realize that we are accountable for how things are playing out. When that realization occurs, a heroic summons follows: What am I asking of the other that I am not addressing myself? I suspect that all of us have a sneaking suspicion that we are deferring this question, this responsibility, and have done so for a long time.
I call that question heroic because it embodies a shift in our center of gravity from the other “out there” to the other “within.” In other words, something in each of us always knows when we are shirking, avoiding, procrastinating, rationalizing. Sometimes we are obliged to face these uncomfortable facts when our plans, relationships, expectations of others collapse, and we are left holding the bag of consequences. Sometimes others get in our face and demand we deal with what we have avoided. Sometimes we have interruptive symptoms, troubling dreams, meetings with ourselves in dark hours, and then we have to face the fugitive life we are perpetuating. Something within us always knows and always registers its opinion. Naturally, we will avoid this subpoena from the soul as long as we can, until it knocks so forcibly that we have to answer the door. The moment we say, “I am responsible, I am accountable, I have to deal with this,” is the day we grow up, at least until the next time, the next regression, the next evasion.
When those attending my workshops so readily begin to write about where they need to grow up, it is not that they haven’t thought about it before. Actually, the issues lie quite close to the surface. What has been avoided — a delayed confrontation, the acknowledgment of a talent, a path of reconciliation, or whatever the threatening summons — they have wrestled with many times before. Sadly, what is made conscious does not thereby simply resolve itself. If only it did. The motives for avoidance rise from our existential proclivities to fear and lethargy, and both nemeses win more battles than they lose. All the while, the soul is roiling beneath, sending up protests, distress calls, SOS messages, bills of indictment, and so on. How fast do we have to run and for how long do we have to evade before these bills come home to our living room? Each of us knows all this, which is why it is so relatively simple to acknowledge where we need to grow up.
The hero archetype is an energy we have lauded for millennia: a person who addresses a task, overcomes a fear, acts where needed, and provides an exemplum for others. But do we realize the presence of the hero archetype within us? To call it an archetype is to recognize its universal presence, found in all peoples in all eras. The task of the hero within is to overthrow the powers of darkness, namely, fear and lethargy. All those tales of defeating the dragon are mythopoetic versions of overthrowing the power of that which would swallow us, as both fear and lethargy do on a daily basis. Sooner or later, we are each called to face what we fear, respond to our summons to show up, and overcome the vast lethargic powers within us. This is what is asked of us, to show up as the person we really are, as best we can manage, under circumstances over which we may have no control. This showing up as best we can is growing up. That is all that life really asks of us: to show up as best we can.
I have always been moved by the example of Marcus Aurelius. Though he was the emperor and could have enjoyed any besotted sinecure back in Rome, he chose to be out in the field to face the Hun who wished to kill him. Was he different from us? No, he had the same fears and lethargic impulses we all have. Every day was a battle for him, as it is for us. He was as susceptible as we to the easy comfort of despair that we have more to handle than someone else or that others are better equipped than we for life’s journey. All of us have the same fears, the same seductive lethargy, and the same capacity for avoiding growing up. To compensate for my intimidation by fear and my inducement to lethargic avoidance, I often read the words of Marcus Aurelius as he rose in the morning, full of doubt, flush with fear, and replete with ready rationalizations to avoid what threatened:
At day’s first light, have in readiness, against disinclination to leave your bed, the thought that “I am rising for the work of man.” Must I grumble at setting out to do what I was born for, and for the sake of which I have been brought into the world? Is this the purpose of my creation, to lie here under the blankets and keep myself warm? “Ah, but it is a great deal more pleasant!” Was it for pleasure, then, that you were born and not for work?1
When I read these words to myself, I imagine I can see him, sharing the fate of his comrades, cold and shivering on the freezing Donau, and facing implacable enemies. And why do I repeatedly read these words? Because they remind me to stop feeling sorry for myself, my privileged life and privileged opportunities, and to stop whining and looking for an easy path. I remind myself to show up, in the best way I can, winning some of those internal battles against fear and lethargy, losing some, but with the fond hope that if I show up as best I can, then I will also be a grown-up. That is what life asks of each of us: to grow up, be accountable, be present. That is what our partners ask of us, our children ask of us, and our world asks of us. When we show up as best we can, then on any given day, we are a grown-up and contribute to carrying the world’s burden, rather than adding to it.
Ask yourself these simple questions: Where do I need to grow up, step into my life? What fear will I need to confront in doing so? Is that fear realistic or from an earlier time in my development? And, given that heavy feeling I have carried for so long already, what is the price I have to pay for not growing up?