Dear Jade (or Morgan or Ray or Charles),
You decided to open this letter hoping to get some ideas about investing that you'll find useful and helpful. Naturally, in writing up these ideas for you, that's my hope too. So in writing this letter, my rule has been KISS—Keep It Short ‘n’ Simple—for your convenience.
You probably know that investing can be complicated, so this could have been a very long letter. (If you ever want a longer explanation of how to succeed in investing, you can always read my Elements of Investing: Easy Lessons for Every Investor, or, if you want more, Winning the Losers' Game.)
Two suggestions: If, after reading the letter, you decide you're not yet all that interested in thinking seriously about saving and investing, put the letter back in the envelope and reopen it in about five years. If you're still not really interested, retain the valuable services of a professional investment adviser to guide you as you make decisions.
If you decide you are seriously interested in learning about investing, keep a diary of your investment decisions: what you expect of each investment when you make it and, later on, how the results compare to your original expectations. Like a videotape of you playing tennis or skiing, this objective feedback will help you learn both more and faster—how to do your best in investing. (As in driving, the secret to success is mostly not making big mistakes.)
12 Investment Guidelines
- Here are 12 investment guidelines to consider. Naturally, I hope you'll find each of them useful.
- Since you'll be investing for many years—you'll continue investing for at least 50 years—invest always for the very long term. Over the long term, the highest average returns are achieved with stocks. So, except for a modest “in case of emergencies” savings fund, concentrate your investing in stocks. (Before investing in bonds, give serious consideration to #11 below.)
- Since nobody can know which companies and stocks will do “better” than expected, always diversify your investments widely. An important reality explains why: “Better” in investing really means better than expected by the full-time professional investors who have superb information and now dominate the stock market and set all the prices. (As I write this in 2013, professional investors do more than 90% of all NYSE trading, up extraordinarily from less than 10% 50 years ago.) As my friend Burt Malkiel so wisely says, “Diversification is the only free lunch in investing.”
- When observing the short-term behavior of the stock market, ignore the day-to-day and the week-to-week price gyrations and news reports. Concentrate instead on longer-term averages or norms. Just as when buying a home, you would ignore thunderstorms or a heatwave—the daily weather—but would think carefully about the area's overall climate, always take a long-term view.
Remember that when stock prices go down that's actually good news for long-term investors, because you can buy more shares with the same dollars. Also remember that Mr. Market—a colorful, tricky rascal—is always trying to capture your attention and get you excited or upset so he can trick you into buying or selling by moving stock prices around. Don't let him ever interfere with your steady focus on the discipline and serious work of building long-term investment value.
- Minimize trading to minimize costs and taxes. Never make an investment you don't expect to stay with for at least 10 years and hope to stay with for 25 years. If you invest this way, you'll not only save on taxes and trading costs, you'll teach yourself to make better investment decisions before you act. That's why Warren Buffett suggests we all limit our lifetime investment decisions to 10, so we'll oblige ourselves to make more careful, thoughtful, long-term choices whenever we do take action.
- Carefully consider low-cost indexing. By reliably and consistently delivering the market rate of return with broad diversification and very low turnover (and so incurring low costs and taxes and fees), low funds outperform the great majority of “active” investors no matter what the chosen objectives (i.e., growth, value, small cap, international, etc.). Those who know the most about investing agree that low-cost index funds are best for most investors.
- Beware of fees. They may look low, but they are actually very high when looked at realistically. Yes, most investors innocently describe mutual fund fees with one four-letter word and one number, but both word and number are wrong! Conventionally, we say mutual fund fees are “only” (the four-letter word) 1% (the number). But 1% of what? Your assets! Since you already have your assets, you are paying for something else: a return on your assets.
So, calculated as a percent of returns, that 1% of assets is closer to 15% of returns (if the consensus expectation of 7% returns holds). That 15% is a lot more than 1%—and nobody would say “only” 15%. But even 15% would be misleading.
As we all learned in Economics 101, every price should be compared to the price of every alternative good or service to reveal the incremental price of each alternative compared to its incremental value. (That's what smart shoppers do at the grocery store and what savvy diners do when studying a menu or a wine list.) When you do this, you'll quickly see that the incremental fees for active management are really high—on average, more than 100% of incremental returns!
- While the past does not guarantee the future, understanding investment history is certainly the best way to understand how best to invest for the long term. So here are a few of the lessons of history:
- Index funds achieve higher long-term returns than most actively managed funds, particularly after fees and taxes. (Over the past 15 years, 85% of mutual funds fell short of their chosen benchmarks—before taxes!)
- Index fund fees are less than 1/10th as much as the fees of actively managed funds.
- Index funds incur much lower taxes.
- While index funds will never have “beat the market” results, they avoid the bane of active management: underperformance. And they do outperform most of the competition. “Top Quartile” performance is an unrealistic aspiration for active managers, but for indexers, that is the realistic expectation.
- Unlike active managers, index funds reliably and consistently achieve their investment objective every day, every month, every year, and every decade.
So please carefully consider indexing for all of your investments.
- Active investment management is always “interesting,” and in the short run, can be exciting—or painful. But be careful. Many brilliant, imaginative, hard-working, extraordinarily well-informed, full-time professionals have flooded into investing institutions all over the world and are now competing with all the others all the time.
So it cannot be surprising that their collective best judgments—while necessarily imperfect—have become so good that, by the millennium, two major changes were evident to careful observers. It had become difficult for any active manager to beat the market after fees and operating costs over the longer term. Equally daunting, it had become virtually impossible to figure out in advance which individual active managers would be the lucky ones that would beat the market.
- Fortunately for you, finding managers who would beat the market—which used to be many investors' goal when markets and investing were so different back in the 1960s and 1970s—is not nearly as important for your long-term investing success as knowing yourself.
What really matters most is figuring out—often best done with a professional investment adviser—the long-term investment program that is best suited to you: your financial resources, your spending objectives, your time-horizon, and your ability to stay the course.
Always remember that for long-term investment success, you are more important by far than the stock market. So take the time to “know thyself” financially. Once you have done this well, your other decisions will be much easier to make and your decisions will be better matched to your true objectives.
- Most investors who do not succeed have made at least one—and sometimes all—of three “classic” mistakes. Please be sure you avoid all three.
- Trying to beat the market. Some folks do beat the market each year, but usually only because they got lucky. (While most patrons at gambling casinos lose, there are “lucky winners” every day, which keeps the gamblers coming.) Most investors who try to beat the market fail and, if honest with themselves, wish they had never tried. Besides, you'll have many much better things to do with your time than chasing after will-of-the-wisp “investment opportunities.”
- Borrowing on margin to really beat the market—and then getting caught short. Leverage works both ways. So be careful.
- Buying after stocks have gone way up, particularly buying the stocks that are up the most, or selling at the bottom after stocks have gone way down and converting a temporary loss into a permanent loss.
- Try always to see the whole picture when you make financial decisions. For example, your salary or earned income—with its predictable cash payments in exchange for your knowledge capital—will be similar to interest income from owning bonds: fairly predictable and low risk. What this means in a “whole picture” view of your financial situation can be surprisingly important. Social Security is another important part of your “whole picture.” When you own a home, it will be part of your total portfolio. So you should be less concerned when the stock market goes up or down.
If interest rates are 5%, the equivalent market value of your knowledge capital would be 20 times what you get paid in salary—multiplied by your future years of working and discounted back to its present value. So, if you are young and save each year just $10,000, that “knowledge capital” part of your whole picture financial portfolio would be a lot like the income from owning $2,000,000 in bonds.
Recognizing this “whole portfolio” reality, you may decide that also holding substantial investments in bonds—often recommended for “portfolio balance”—does not make much sense when you are less than 50.
- Saving is always the first step toward investing. Time is important too. In combination, time and saving—compounding—can be very powerful.
Sensible investing lets money make money for you. Here's an example. The amazing Rule of 72 tells you for any interest rate how many years it will take to double your money. At 8%, it takes nine years; at 10%, it takes 7.2 years; and at 3%, it takes 24 years to double—and the same number of years to double again, and so on. So if you save $5 today and invest it at 6%, in 12 years, it will be $10; in 24 years, $20; and in 36 years, $40. So when you save $5 today, try to remember that those $5 want to be $40 that you can spend in the future (after, of course, adjusting for inflation).
In all his flying career, Admiral Koch never had an accident. I fly a lot too: 10 overseas trips a year and dozens of domestic flights. My record is perfect too: no accidents in over 60 years of flying. So, we both have been safe flyers.
But my flying is a lot like indexing: very deliberate, reliable, safe, no excitement (dull, really), no important skills required of me, and (on a cost per mile basis) low cost. All I need to do is decide where and when I want to go, make a reservation, get to the airport on time, check in, go to the right gate, sit in the right seat, and buckle the seatbelt. But I do need to decide whether I'm going to Hong Kong or London. So, as an investor, you will always want to be active on investment policy.
While the highly skilled and well-trained pilot and crew are doing all the work of actively managing the plane's operations, I've got better things to do with my time—like writing this letter to you with the hope that you'll find these ideas about investing useful to you as you decide how you will design and manage your investment program for success over the very long term.
Your loving grandfather, Charley
P.S.: My father-in-law was an expert U.S. Navy pilot. He was an Annapolis all-America athlete, commander of the USS John F. Kennedy when it was the world's most powerful warship, a two-star admiral and the world record-holder for one of the most dangerous actions in naval air: landing a fighter-bomber on a carrier…at sea…at night!